Reading the WAPO article this morning on Miller (hat tip to the boys over at RK), I started wondering about a part in the article:
“Taxes. We gotta cut ‘em, but we gotta make sure that we cut ‘em in a way that we can pay for them,” Miller told Virginia Beach resident Virgil Kilpatrick at the Norfolk AFR’AM Festival last month.
“So you’re all about changing the tax system?” Kilpatrick asked.
“Absolutely. I’m a business guy,” Miller said. “I’m all about doing things in a businesslike way.”
One of Miller’s biggest negatives is that he’s a lobbyist, and with MZM/Abramhoff, that’s a dirty word. What I want to question is the idea of running government like a business. I don’t think that’s a bad idea. I’ve said many times that if you ran a business like the US Government, you wouldn’t last very long.
No one likes taxes; the Republican party would have you believe that the Democratic party drinks the blood of the innocent in order to raise taxes. I don’t like the idea of higher taxes to pay for a war, but I like even less the idea of cutting taxes and still paying for a war. The pay as you go program was a great plan, which Miller brought up at the Flag Day Celebration on Sunday.
Now, it’s no secret that I have a beef with people who take Miller’s point out of context that Bush’s tax cuts are “a good idea” without talking about finding a way to pay for them. Especially when these people attack the Miller mailers for taking Jim Webb’s words out of context. It’s hypocrisy. I believe there should be a law banning ellipses in campaign literature. Print the whole thing.
But I wonder, what would happen if all the Senators and Congresspeople got to Washington DC, sat down with business persons (or even gave attention to the members who are from business, or people like Mark Warner) and said, “Lets run this place like we (and the IRS) expect a business to be run. Quarterly filings, operate in the black, etc.
This could be one advantage to Harris Miller. While I think the lobbyist scarlet letter still hangs, in a day when people are worried about the national debt, do you accept the lobbyist title to further the businessman title? Is this a wise strategy? There is no way the VA blogs are going to let the lobbyist title slide, so why not play up the businessman role as a strength?
I welcome discussion on the point, but not personal attacks on Miller or Webb. Argue the point not the man.